IGV vs. IWF

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).

IGV and IWF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P North American Technology-Software Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2001. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IGV and IWF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IGV vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IGV vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET	-24.52%	5.56%	23.41%	58.56%	-35.65%	12.30%	52.86%	34.33%	12.44%	42.16%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	-9.05%	18.33%	33.12%	42.59%	-29.31%	27.43%	38.25%	35.86%	-1.67%	29.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than IWF's -9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 14.78%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 16.63% annualized return.

IGV

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -3.62%
• YTD: -24.52%
• 6M: -30.68%
• 1Y: -11.68%
• 3Y*: 9.39%
• 5Y*: 2.68%
• 10Y*: 14.78%

IWF

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -4.65%
• YTD: -9.05%
• 6M: -8.54%
• 1Y: 18.65%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: 16.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGV vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGV has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio.

IGV

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET

IWF

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

Return for Risk

IGV vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGV

IGV Risk / Return Rank: 6
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6

IWF

IWF Risk / Return Rank: 45
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 47
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGV vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGV	IWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	0.84	-1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.42	1.35	-1.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.19	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	1.20	-1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.76	4.08	-4.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGV vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGV Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGV and IWF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGV	IWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41	0.84	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.58	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.80	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.37	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between IGV and IWF is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IGV vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.35%	0.02%	0.16%	0.09%	0.82%	0.22%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.39%	0.36%	0.46%	0.67%	0.91%	0.49%	0.66%	0.99%	1.27%	1.10%	1.43%	1.37%

Drawdowns

IGV vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, roughly equal to the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and IWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGV	IWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.45%	-64.25%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.72%	-16.27%	-18.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.85%	-32.72%	-13.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.85%	-32.72%	-13.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.28%	-12.36%	-19.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.37%	-22.21%	+7.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.66%	4.80%	+8.86%

Volatility

IGV vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) at 6.82%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGV	IWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	6.82%	+1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.68%	12.39%	+7.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.42%	22.41%	+6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.08%	21.41%	+5.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.88%	20.92%	+4.96%