IGUS.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
IGUS.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGUS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 30, 2010. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both IGUS.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGUS.L or CSPX.L.
Key characteristics
| IGUS.L | CSPX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.76% | 20.22% |
| 1Y Return | 33.08% | 34.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.36% | 11.09% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.15% | 16.10% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.14% | 12.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.97 | 3.08 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.95% | 12.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.66% | -33.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.75% | -0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGUS.L and CSPX.L is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IGUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IGUS.L having a 19.76% return and CSPX.L slightly higher at 20.22%. Over the past 10 years, IGUS.L has underperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 11.14%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGUS.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IGUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGUS.L and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGUS.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 4.08%. This indicates that IGUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.