IGRO vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
IGRO and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Global ex-US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on May 17, 2016. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both IGRO and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IGRO vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGRO vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGRO iShares International Dividend Growth ETF | 2.71% | 25.03% | 7.78% | 15.38% | -12.72% | 9.94% | 7.71% | 26.13% | -14.86% | 24.64% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 3.91% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGRO achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 3.91% return.
IGRO
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- 2.71%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGRO vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGRO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IGRO vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
IGRO
COWZ
IGRO vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGRO | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.96 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.43 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.20 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.68 | 5.59 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGRO | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.96 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.62 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.63 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGRO and COWZ is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IGRO vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
IGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than COWZ's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGRO iShares International Dividend Growth ETF | 2.48% | 2.51% | 2.44% | 2.79% | 2.69% | 2.27% | 2.41% | 2.65% | 2.97% | 2.43% | 1.18% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.07% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
IGRO vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGRO and COWZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGRO | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.25% | -38.63% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -13.55% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -22.00% | -4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.69% | -3.72% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.74% | -4.85% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.92% | -0.31% |
Volatility
IGRO vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.96%. This indicates that IGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGRO | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 2.96% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 8.37% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 17.50% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 17.73% | -3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 20.08% | -3.19% |