PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGPT vs. QTUM-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IGPT vs. QTUM-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Qtum (QTUM-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 50.51% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM-USD's -51.63% return.


IGPT

1D
3.23%
1M
-6.05%
6M
36.61%
YTD
50.51%
1Y
80.58%
3Y*
37.96%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
19.82%
ALL TIME*
15.04%

QTUM-USD

1D
-0.71%
1M
-9.67%
6M
-41.33%
YTD
-51.63%
1Y
-68.49%
3Y*
-36.64%
5Y*
-39.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-28.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.39M$21.86M$21.83M

QTUM-USD

Qtum
$4.99M$5.69M$10.48M

IGPT vs. QTUM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
50.51%31.55%17.15%27.29%-27.73%-11.79%54.31%35.06%16.38%-2.19%
QTUM-USD
Qtum
-51.63%-55.51%-19.33%103.93%-79.08%293.16%38.57%-24.72%-96.59%425.34%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and QTUM-USD is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGPT vs. QTUM-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IGPT
IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM-USD
QTUM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QTUM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IGPT vs. QTUM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Qtum (QTUM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGPTQTUM-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.86

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

-0.86

+4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

-1.15

+13.48

IGPT vs. QTUM-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the QTUM-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and QTUM-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. QTUM-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, smaller than the maximum QTUM-USD drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and QTUM-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGPTQTUM-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.14%

-99.32%

+49.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.74%

-79.32%

+54.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-88.76%

+59.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.04%

-96.40%

+54.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.20%

-99.32%

+82.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.95%

-93.36%

+81.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

42.21%

-35.65%

Volatility

IGPT vs. QTUM-USD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 14.42% compared to Qtum (QTUM-USD) at 11.62%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGPTQTUM-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.42%

11.62%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.86%

45.93%

-13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.96%

65.60%

-28.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.58%

76.10%

-46.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

98.66%

-71.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGPT and QTUM-USD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGPT has higher volatility (14.42%) compared to QTUM-USD (11.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs QTUM-USD's -99.32%.

IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGPT and QTUM-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer