IGOV vs. ANGL
IGOV (iShares International Treasury Bond ETF) and ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGOV is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US, while ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGOV returned -1.38%/yr vs 6.27%/yr for ANGL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
IGOV vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGOV achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IGOV has underperformed ANGL with an annualized return of -1.38%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.27% annualized return.
IGOV
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- 0.56%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- -4.47%
- 10Y*
- -1.38%
ANGL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
IGOV vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGOV iShares International Treasury Bond ETF | -0.50% | 9.96% | -6.50% | 5.57% | -22.07% | -9.25% | 10.88% | 3.76% | -2.60% | 11.38% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 9.04% | 6.06% | 12.52% | -14.26% | 6.84% | 13.20% | 18.06% | -5.84% | 9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGOV and ANGL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2012 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, IGOV and ANGL have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGOV vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank
IGOV
ANGL
IGOV vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGOV | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.37 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 2.02 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | 8.49 | -8.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGOV | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 1.90 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | 0.45 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 | 0.68 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.74 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
IGOV vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGOV drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGOV and ANGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGOV | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.88% | -29.31% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -4.05% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.65% | -5.48% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.17% | -19.25% | -13.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.88% | -29.31% | -6.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -0.30% | -23.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -3.30% | -7.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 0.96% | +1.46% |
Volatility
IGOV vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 1.37%. This indicates that IGOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGOV | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 1.37% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.19% | 3.46% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.11% | 4.31% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.96% | 7.63% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.59% | 9.28% | -0.69% |
IGOV vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IGOV and ANGL have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
IGOV vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
IGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than ANGL's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.37% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
IGOV iShares International Treasury Bond ETF | 1.42% | 1.41% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.19% | 0.69% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGOV and ANGL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGOV has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to ANGL (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGOV dropped -35.88% vs ANGL's -29.31%.
On 10-year performance, ANGL leads with 6.27% vs -1.38% for IGOV. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ANGL has performed better with a 6.27% return vs -1.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGOV and ANGL have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.42% for IGOV.
IGOV is categorized as International Government Bonds, while ANGL is High Yield Bonds. IGOV tracks S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US, while ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck.
ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGOV and ANGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer