IGOV vs. ANGL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL).
IGOV and ANGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGOV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US. It was launched on Jan 21, 2009. ANGL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2012. Both IGOV and ANGL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGOV or ANGL.
Key characteristics
| IGOV | ANGL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -5.35% | 5.92% |
| 1Y Return | 2.09% | 11.63% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.16% | 0.89% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -4.67% | 4.94% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -1.93% | 5.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.17 | 2.31 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.29 | 3.53 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.04 | 1.44 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.05 | 1.26 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.31 | 15.45 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.74% | 0.74% |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.89% | 4.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.88% | -35.07% |
| Current Drawdown | -29.69% | -0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGOV and ANGL is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IGOV vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IGOV achieves a -5.35% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 5.92% return. Over the past 10 years, IGOV has underperformed ANGL with an annualized return of -1.93%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGOV vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IGOV and ANGL have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGOV vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGOV vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
IGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGOV iShares International Treasury Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.19% | 0.69% | 0.22% | 1.28% | 1.32% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.10% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.20% | 6.00% | 5.25% | 5.79% | 5.82% | 6.80% | 6.10% |
Drawdowns
IGOV vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGOV drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, roughly equal to the maximum ANGL drawdown of -35.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGOV and ANGL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGOV vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 1.35%. This indicates that IGOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.