IGM vs. CHPS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS).
IGM and CHPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P North American Technology Sector Index. It was launched on Mar 13, 2001. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. Both IGM and CHPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGM or CHPS.
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and CHPS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IGM vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IGM:
0.42
CHPS:
-0.24
IGM:
0.78
CHPS:
-0.08
IGM:
1.11
CHPS:
0.99
IGM:
0.46
CHPS:
-0.23
IGM:
1.57
CHPS:
-0.53
IGM:
7.76%
CHPS:
17.37%
IGM:
28.97%
CHPS:
38.61%
IGM:
-65.59%
CHPS:
-39.44%
IGM:
-14.87%
CHPS:
-28.29%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a -9.56% return, which is significantly higher than CHPS's -10.06% return.
IGM
-9.56%
-1.41%
-5.45%
10.56%
18.72%
18.52%
CHPS
-10.06%
-5.01%
-15.15%
-12.84%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGM vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGM vs. CHPS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IGM
CHPS
IGM vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGM vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than CHPS's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.25% | 0.22% | 0.52% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% | 0.88% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 1.97% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IGM vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and CHPS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGM vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 18.73%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 22.78%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.