IGLD vs. AGG
IGLD (FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) and AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLD is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by First Trust, while AGG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. IGLD is actively managed, while AGG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGLD returned 13.02%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for AGG. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLD charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for AGG.
Performance
IGLD vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLD achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.25% return.
IGLD
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
AGG
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
IGLD vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 1.69% | 47.46% | 19.36% | 9.24% | -2.34% | 4.30% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.25% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLD and AGG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLD vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank
IGLD
AGG
IGLD vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLD | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.87 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 5.73 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLD | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.34 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.02 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.59 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
IGLD vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLD drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, roughly equal to the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD and AGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLD | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.59% | -18.43% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.56% | -2.76% | -14.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.56% | -6.11% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.59% | -17.82% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.16% | -2.14% | -13.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -2.71% | -2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 0.90% | +5.53% |
Volatility
IGLD vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.30%. This indicates that IGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLD | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 1.30% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 2.74% | +18.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.24% | 3.85% | +19.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 6.09% | +9.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 5.40% | +9.60% |
IGLD vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGLD vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.92%, more than AGG's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.99% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 17.92% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLD and AGG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGLD has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to AGG (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLD dropped -18.59% vs AGG's -18.43%.
On 5-year performance, IGLD leads with 13.02% vs 0.10% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 13.02% return vs 0.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.
IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 3.99% for AGG.
IGLD is categorized as Precious Metals, while AGG is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IGLD and 0.03% for AGG.
AGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGLD and AGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer