PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IGLD vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IGLD vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
7.26%47.46%19.36%9.24%-2.34%4.30%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
10.48%64.06%26.91%12.96%-0.50%6.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 10.48% return.


IGLD

1D
1.19%
1M
-10.51%
YTD
7.26%
6M
18.12%
1Y
40.06%
3Y*
24.96%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*

AAAU

1D
1.78%
1M
-10.64%
YTD
10.48%
6M
23.10%
1Y
52.53%
3Y*
33.97%
5Y*
22.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IGLD vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IGLD vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLDAAAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.92

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

2.35

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.73

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.64

10.02

-0.38

IGLD vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLDAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.92

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

1.27

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

1.18

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD and AAAU is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IGLD vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.93%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
13.93%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IGLD vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum AAAU drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD and AAAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLDAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-21.63%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.56%

-19.13%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.59%

-20.94%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.51%

-11.65%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-6.01%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

5.21%

-1.08%

Volatility

IGLD vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) have volatilities of 10.62% and 10.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IGLDAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.62%

10.43%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.23%

24.06%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.76%

27.50%

-3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

17.58%

-2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

16.92%

-2.06%