PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGHG vs. CCRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGHG vs. CCRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IGHG

1D
0.05%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.54%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
4.72%

CCRV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGHG vs. CCRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
2.17%5.65%9.20%11.58%-0.90%0.88%5.40%
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%-0.05%5.74%5.47%19.91%33.78%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IGHG and CCRV is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020

0.18

The correlation between IGHG and CCRV shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGHG vs. CCRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGHG
IGHG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IGHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGHG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IGHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGHG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CCRV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGHG vs. CCRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGHGCCRVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

IGHG vs. CCRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGHGCCRVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

IGHG vs. CCRV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGHGCCRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

Volatility

IGHG vs. CCRV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGHGCCRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.46%

IGHG vs. CCRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGHG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CCRV's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGHG vs. CCRV - Dividend Comparison

IGHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, while CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%4.43%7.26%33.27%26.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
5.11%5.14%5.06%4.99%3.55%2.50%2.79%3.48%4.13%3.36%3.37%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGHG and CCRV have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGHG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGHG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.

IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.

IGHG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CCRV is Commodities. IGHG tracks Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IGHG and 0.40% for CCRV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGHG and CCRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer