IGF vs. FNDA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA).

IGF and FNDA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both IGF and FNDA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IGF vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IGF vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	9.19%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	19.31%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	3.11%	7.44%	9.00%	20.29%	-14.83%	31.12%	8.44%	24.34%	-12.12%	12.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGF achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, IGF has underperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 8.80%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.

IGF

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: 9.19%
• 6M: 11.40%
• 1Y: 26.64%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 11.38%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

FNDA

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -5.58%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 4.77%
• 1Y: 19.91%
• 3Y*: 11.61%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGF vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio.

IGF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

FNDA

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF

Return for Risk

IGF vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 93
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 94
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FNDA

FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGF vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGF	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	0.91	+1.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	1.41	+1.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.19	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	1.40	+1.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.62	5.33	+10.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGF vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGF and FNDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGF	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	0.91	+1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.30	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.45	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.45	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between IGF and FNDA is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IGF vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than FNDA's 1.21% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.95%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	1.21%	1.22%	1.53%	1.37%	1.38%	1.15%	1.31%	1.38%	1.64%	1.30%	1.18%	1.33%

Drawdowns

IGF vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGF drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, which is greater than FNDA's maximum drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGF and FNDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGF	FNDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.33%	-44.64%	-13.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.74%	-14.42%	+5.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.83%	-25.92%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.11%	-44.64%	+2.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.42%	-6.96%	+3.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-6.76%	-5.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	3.77%	-2.03%

Volatility

IGF vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is 4.25%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that IGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGF	FNDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	6.37%	-2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.33%	12.74%	-5.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	22.04%	-9.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.89%	21.01%	-7.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	22.36%	-5.55%