IGC vs. AAAU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IGC (India Globalization Capital, Inc.) is a stock, while AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. Over the past 5 years, IGC returned -27.12%/yr vs 18.89%/yr for AAAU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IGC vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in India Globalization Capital, Inc. (IGC) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGC achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 4.00% return.

IGC

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -13.41%
• YTD: 3.06%
• 6M: -5.23%
• 1Y: -2.68%
• 3Y*: -1.12%
• 5Y*: -27.12%
• 10Y*: -4.41%

AAAU

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -2.66%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 6.50%
• 1Y: 32.47%
• 3Y*: 31.82%
• 5Y*: 18.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGC vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IGC India Globalization Capital, Inc.	3.06%	-16.25%	19.96%	-11.95%	-67.42%	-37.40%	147.62%	125.00%	-30.00%
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	4.00%	64.06%	26.91%	12.96%	-0.50%	-4.01%	25.02%	18.17%	9.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IGC and AAAU is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018	0.07

Return for Risk

IGC vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGC

IGC Risk / Return Rank: 37
IGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
IGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
IGC Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
IGC Martin Ratio Rank: 35

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 34
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGC vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for India Globalization Capital, Inc. (IGC) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGC	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	1.24	-1.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.64	-1.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.25	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	1.88	-2.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	4.73	-5.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGC vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGC and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGC	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	1.24	-1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	1.07	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	1.10	-1.23

Drawdowns

IGC vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGC drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGC and AAAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGC	AAAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.76%	-21.63%	-78.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.15%	-19.13%	-28.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.99%	-19.13%	-44.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.13%	-20.94%	-70.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.51%	-16.84%	-82.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.07%	-6.18%	-78.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.87%	7.61%	+21.26%

Volatility

IGC vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

India Globalization Capital, Inc. (IGC) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 5.76%. This indicates that IGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGC	AAAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.56%	5.76%	+2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.81%	22.92%	+14.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.05%	26.43%	+31.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.77%	17.85%	+72.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	208.83%	16.99%	+191.84%

Dividends

IGC vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGC nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGC and AAAU in my portfolio?

IGC and AAAU have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGC or AAAU?

IGC has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to AAAU (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGC dropped -99.76% vs AAAU's -21.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.