PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IGC vs. AAAU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IGC and AAAU is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

IGC vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in India Globalization Capital, Inc. (IGC) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-28.33%
9.71%
IGC
AAAU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IGC:

0.24

AAAU:

2.11

Sortino Ratio

IGC:

1.09

AAAU:

2.76

Omega Ratio

IGC:

1.14

AAAU:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

IGC:

0.21

AAAU:

3.88

Martin Ratio

IGC:

0.58

AAAU:

10.60

Ulcer Index

IGC:

35.81%

AAAU:

2.97%

Daily Std Dev

IGC:

87.92%

AAAU:

14.96%

Max Drawdown

IGC:

-99.76%

AAAU:

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

IGC:

-99.45%

AAAU:

-3.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGC achieves a -2.95% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 2.81% return.


IGC

YTD

-2.95%

1M

-21.21%

6M

-27.39%

1Y

20.78%

5Y*

-15.40%

10Y*

-6.39%

AAAU

YTD

2.81%

1M

1.72%

6M

9.71%

1Y

32.75%

5Y*

11.47%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IGC vs. AAAU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IGC is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IGC is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IGC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IGC is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IGC is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IGC is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAAU is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAAU is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAAU is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAAU is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAAU is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAAU is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IGC vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for India Globalization Capital, Inc. (IGC) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IGC, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.242.11
The chart of Sortino ratio for IGC, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.092.76
The chart of Omega ratio for IGC, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.141.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for IGC, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.213.88
The chart of Martin ratio for IGC, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.000.5810.60
IGC
AAAU

The current IGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGC and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.24
2.11
IGC
AAAU

Dividends

IGC vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGC nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IGC vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGC drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGC and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-97.49%
-3.26%
IGC
AAAU

Volatility

IGC vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

India Globalization Capital, Inc. (IGC) has a higher volatility of 18.91% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 3.84%. This indicates that IGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
18.91%
3.84%
IGC
AAAU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab