PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGC.L vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IGC.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in India Capital Growth Fund (IGC.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGC.L is traded in GBp, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGC.L achieves a -6.18% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -5.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IGC.L has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 9.91%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.


IGC.L

1D
0.95%
1M
2.24%
YTD
-6.18%
6M
-8.86%
1Y
-5.90%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
9.91%

BRK-B

1D
0.00%
1M
3.02%
YTD
-5.08%
6M
-6.22%
1Y
-2.28%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
13.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGC.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGC.L
India Capital Growth Fund
-6.18%-11.69%11.27%34.11%7.72%42.73%18.84%-19.31%-24.89%59.59%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-4.39%2.99%29.31%9.69%15.59%30.17%-0.64%6.71%9.11%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IGC.L and BRK-B is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.09

The correlation between IGC.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IGC.L:

£127.29M

BRK-B:

$1.03T

EPS

IGC.L:

£0.05

BRK-B:

$33.62

PE Ratio

IGC.L:

34.85

BRK-B:

14.24

PEG Ratio

IGC.L:

0.13

BRK-B:

0.55

PS Ratio

IGC.L:

2.21

BRK-B:

2.75

PB Ratio

IGC.L:

1.01

BRK-B:

1.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

IGC.L:

£59.68M

BRK-B:

$375.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IGC.L:

£52.56M

BRK-B:

$94.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

IGC.L:

£5.86M

BRK-B:

$71.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGC.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGC.L
IGC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IGC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IGC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGC.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for India Capital Growth Fund (IGC.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGC.LBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.99

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

-0.19

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

-0.42

-0.06

IGC.L vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGC.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGC.L and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGC.LBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

-0.15

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.68

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.69

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.59

-0.52

Drawdowns

IGC.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGC.L drawdown since its inception was -86.00%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGC.L and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGC.LBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.00%

-37.92%

-48.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.01%

-11.88%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.95%

-17.26%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.95%

-20.84%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.00%

-21.44%

-51.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.04%

-14.52%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.76%

-7.39%

-31.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.44%

5.50%

+6.94%

Volatility

IGC.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

India Capital Growth Fund (IGC.L) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.82%. This indicates that IGC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGC.LBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

3.82%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.39%

11.92%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.93%

15.39%

+5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.64%

16.89%

+10.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.83%

19.85%

+7.98%

Dividends

IGC.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGC.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IGC.L vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between India Capital Growth Fund and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B202120222023202420252026
23.62M
93.68B
(IGC.L) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IGC.L values in GBp, BRK-B values in USD

IGC.L vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between India Capital Growth Fund and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
95.9%
28.8%
Portfolio components
IGC.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, India Capital Growth Fund reported a gross profit of 22.66M and revenue of 23.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

BRK-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

IGC.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, India Capital Growth Fund reported an operating income of -2.67M and revenue of 23.62M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.3%.

BRK-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

IGC.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, India Capital Growth Fund reported a net income of -2.90M and revenue of 23.62M, resulting in a net margin of -12.3%.

BRK-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IGC.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGC.L and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer