IFRA vs. RGI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RGI).
IFRA and RGI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IFRA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018. RGI is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Equal Weight Index Industrials. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. Both IFRA and RGI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IFRA or RGI.
Correlation
The correlation between IFRA and RGI is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IFRA vs. RGI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IFRA:
1.01
RGI:
1.30
IFRA:
1.52
RGI:
1.91
IFRA:
1.18
RGI:
1.23
IFRA:
1.51
RGI:
0.39
IFRA:
5.02
RGI:
7.23
IFRA:
3.23%
RGI:
2.58%
IFRA:
15.97%
RGI:
14.29%
IFRA:
-41.06%
RGI:
-82.66%
IFRA:
-10.74%
RGI:
-36.19%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFRA achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly lower than RGI's 17.82% return.
IFRA
16.13%
-7.61%
9.86%
18.01%
12.15%
N/A
RGI
17.82%
-4.85%
10.38%
20.45%
14.38%
11.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IFRA vs. RGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IFRA and RGI have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IFRA vs. RGI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IFRA vs. RGI - Dividend Comparison
IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than RGI's 0.66% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.76% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.07% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGI Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 0.66% | 1.06% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.28% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
IFRA vs. RGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum RGI drawdown of -82.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and RGI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IFRA vs. RGI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RGI) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.