PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFRA vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFRA vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFRA achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return.


IFRA

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
16.86%
6M
16.28%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFRA vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
16.86%15.90%17.02%13.42%-3.32%29.81%7.37%27.00%-8.57%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IFRA and IVV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018

0.71

The correlation between IFRA and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IFRA vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFRA
IVV

Industrials

39.4%
8.3%

Utilities

37.7%
2.4%

Basic Materials

14.7%
1.8%

Energy

7.9%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
4.9%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Industrials

IFRA
39.4%
IVV
8.3%

Utilities

IFRA
37.7%
IVV
2.4%

Basic Materials

IFRA
14.7%
IVV
1.8%

Energy

IFRA
7.9%
IVV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IFRA
0.0%
IVV
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

IFRA
0.0%
IVV
4.9%

Communication Services

IFRA

-

IVV
11.2%

Financial Services

IFRA

-

IVV
11.8%

Healthcare

IFRA

-

IVV
8.5%

Real Estate

IFRA

-

IVV
1.9%

Technology

IFRA

-

IVV
35.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFRA vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFRA
IFRA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFRA vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFRAIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.17

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

14.71

-2.01

IFRA vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFRA and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFRAIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.39

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.83

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.45

+0.18

Drawdowns

IFRA vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFRAIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-55.25%

+14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-8.89%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.93%

-18.75%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.93%

-24.53%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-0.76%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-10.78%

+5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.91%

+0.34%

Volatility

IFRA vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that IFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFRAIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

2.87%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

8.90%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

11.80%

+2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.92%

16.88%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

18.05%

+3.33%

IFRA vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFRA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFRA vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
1.59%1.84%1.75%1.98%1.98%1.63%2.08%1.68%2.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFRA and IVV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFRA has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFRA dropped -41.06% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.88% vs 13.03% for IFRA. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.88% return vs 13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IFRA.

IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

IFRA is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IFRA and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFRA and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer