PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IFF vs. RPM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


IFFRPM
YTD Return7.73%-2.12%
1Y Return-4.47%35.67%
3Y Return (Ann)-12.92%5.86%
5Y Return (Ann)-6.49%14.27%
10Y Return (Ann)1.20%12.18%
Sharpe Ratio-0.191.48
Daily Std Dev34.03%23.53%
Max Drawdown-67.63%-61.69%
Current Drawdown-39.58%-9.47%

Fundamentals


IFFRPM
Market Cap$21.60B$13.83B
EPS-$10.05$4.34
PE Ratio1.37K24.74
PEG Ratio19.131.91
Revenue (TTM)$11.48B$7.34B
Gross Profit (TTM)$4.15B$2.43B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.75B$1.01B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between IFF and RPM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

IFF vs. RPM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IFF achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly higher than RPM's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IFF has underperformed RPM with an annualized return of 1.20%, while RPM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%25,000.00%30,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5,166.96%
27,235.35%
IFF
RPM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

RPM International Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IFF vs. RPM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) and RPM International Inc. (RPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IFF, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IFF, currently valued at -0.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IFF, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IFF, currently valued at -0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IFF, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.31
RPM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RPM, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RPM, currently valued at 2.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.45
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RPM, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RPM, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RPM, currently valued at 6.13, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.13

IFF vs. RPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFF Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the RPM Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of IFF and RPM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.19
1.48
IFF
RPM

Dividends

IFF vs. RPM - Dividend Comparison

IFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than RPM's 1.66% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
3.26%4.00%3.05%2.07%2.79%2.29%2.12%1.74%2.04%1.72%1.70%1.70%
RPM
RPM International Inc.
1.66%1.54%1.66%1.52%1.61%1.84%2.23%2.33%2.09%2.39%1.93%1.66%

Drawdowns

IFF vs. RPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFF drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than RPM's maximum drawdown of -61.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFF and RPM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-39.58%
-9.47%
IFF
RPM

Volatility

IFF vs. RPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) is 6.75%, while RPM International Inc. (RPM) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that IFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.75%
7.12%
IFF
RPM

Financials

IFF vs. RPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. and RPM International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items