IEMG vs. ONEQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ).
IEMG and ONEQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IEMG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. ONEQ is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2003. Both IEMG and ONEQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IEMG or ONEQ.
Correlation
The correlation between IEMG and ONEQ is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IEMG vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IEMG:
0.56
ONEQ:
1.71
IEMG:
0.89
ONEQ:
2.26
IEMG:
1.11
ONEQ:
1.31
IEMG:
0.33
ONEQ:
2.34
IEMG:
1.97
ONEQ:
8.65
IEMG:
4.30%
ONEQ:
3.59%
IEMG:
15.07%
ONEQ:
18.11%
IEMG:
-38.71%
ONEQ:
-55.09%
IEMG:
-15.99%
ONEQ:
-3.30%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 3.65%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
IEMG
-0.40%
-3.16%
-2.86%
11.17%
1.47%
3.65%
ONEQ
0.99%
-3.30%
8.52%
31.33%
17.01%
16.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEMG vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IEMG vs. ONEQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IEMG
ONEQ
IEMG vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IEMG vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than ONEQ's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.21% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.34% | 2.28% | 2.52% | 2.30% |
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock | 0.65% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% | 1.19% |
Drawdowns
IEMG vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and ONEQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IEMG vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is 3.96%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that IEMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.