IEMG vs. MCHI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI).
IEMG and MCHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IEMG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. MCHI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. Both IEMG and MCHI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IEMG or MCHI.
Performance
IEMG vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than MCHI's 16.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has outperformed MCHI with an annualized return of 3.48%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.
IEMG
7.27%
-5.70%
-1.26%
12.36%
3.55%
3.48%
MCHI
16.80%
-4.67%
0.31%
12.79%
-2.65%
1.60%
Key characteristics
IEMG | MCHI | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 0.76 | 0.28 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.15 | 0.64 |
Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.08 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.45 | 0.14 |
Martin Ratio | 3.77 | 0.85 |
Ulcer Index | 3.02% | 10.22% |
Daily Std Dev | 15.04% | 31.19% |
Max Drawdown | -38.72% | -62.84% |
Current Drawdown | -15.04% | -47.83% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEMG vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between IEMG and MCHI is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IEMG vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IEMG vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison
IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than MCHI's 2.50% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.77% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.34% | 2.28% | 2.52% | 2.30% | 1.76% |
iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.50% | 3.49% | 2.16% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
IEMG vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.72%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and MCHI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IEMG vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is 4.55%, while iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a volatility of 10.81%. This indicates that IEMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.