PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDRV vs. MOTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDRV vs. MOTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDRV achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than MOTO's 27.74% return.


IDRV

1D
-1.46%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
5.68%
6M
3.86%
1Y
37.31%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-1.98%
10Y*

MOTO

1D
0.92%
1M
2.82%
YTD
27.74%
6M
27.33%
1Y
52.58%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDRV vs. MOTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDRV
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
5.68%32.24%-16.05%7.83%-36.37%26.99%59.46%3.59%
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
27.74%27.38%2.01%27.10%-27.20%17.22%59.13%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IDRV and MOTO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019

0.87

The correlation between IDRV and MOTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDRV vs. MOTO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDRV
MOTO

Consumer Cyclical

56.7%
26.4%

Industrials

24.5%
18.7%

Basic Materials

16.8%
3.6%

Technology

2.0%
45.1%

Communication Services

-

4.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.1%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IDRV
56.7%
MOTO
26.4%

Industrials

IDRV
24.5%
MOTO
18.7%

Basic Materials

IDRV
16.8%
MOTO
3.6%

Technology

IDRV
2.0%
MOTO
45.1%

Communication Services

IDRV

-

MOTO
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDRV

-

MOTO
2.1%

Energy

IDRV

-

MOTO

-

Financial Services

IDRV

-

MOTO
1.0%

Healthcare

IDRV

-

MOTO

-

Real Estate

IDRV

-

MOTO

-

Utilities

IDRV

-

MOTO
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDRV vs. MOTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDRV
IDRV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MOTO
MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDRV vs. MOTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDRVMOTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.96

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

13.58

-4.96

IDRV vs. MOTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDRV Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the MOTO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDRV and MOTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDRV vs. MOTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDRV drawdown since its inception was -53.00%, which is greater than MOTO's maximum drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDRV and MOTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDRVMOTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.00%

-38.24%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-13.36%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.00%

-26.43%

-17.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.00%

-37.34%

-15.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.24%

-2.87%

-19.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.35%

-9.93%

-12.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

3.88%

+0.46%

Volatility

IDRV vs. MOTO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) has a higher volatility of 11.16% compared to SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) at 10.12%. This indicates that IDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDRVMOTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

10.12%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.22%

18.43%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.33%

22.55%

+3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.02%

23.89%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.23%

26.40%

+1.83%

IDRV vs. MOTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDRV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than MOTO's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDRV vs. MOTO - Dividend Comparison

IDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than MOTO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IDRV
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
1.61%1.70%2.68%2.17%2.29%1.12%0.69%1.29%
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
0.83%1.06%1.07%2.73%2.33%0.55%2.71%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDRV and MOTO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDRV has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to MOTO (10.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDRV dropped -53.00% vs MOTO's -38.24%.

On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 10.34% vs -1.98% for IDRV. On fees, IDRV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, MOTO has been the lower-risk option at 10.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 10.34% return vs -1.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDRV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.

IDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.83% for MOTO.

IDRV is categorized as Technology Equities, while MOTO is Transportation Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IDRV and 0.68% for MOTO.

MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDRV and MOTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer