PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IDGT vs. BUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IDGT vs. BUG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) and BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross while BUG tracks the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDGT returned 11.98%/yr vs 3.60%/yr for BUG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDGT charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUG.

Performance

IDGT vs. BUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 45.86% return, which is significantly higher than BUG's 11.69% return.

IDGT

1D
-1.84%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
45.86%
6M
44.45%
1Y
53.87%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
14.39%

BUG

1D
2.13%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
11.69%
6M
9.26%
1Y
-6.48%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDGT vs. BUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF		45.86%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%4.25%
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity ETF		11.69%-5.04%9.59%41.40%-33.63%13.24%70.83%6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IDGT and BUG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019

0.58

The correlation between IDGT and BUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDGT vs. BUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IDGT
BUG

Technology

56.9%
100.0%

Real Estate

35.5%

-

Communication Services

6.7%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IDGT
56.9%
BUG
100.0%

Real Estate

IDGT
35.5%
BUG

-

Communication Services

IDGT
6.7%
BUG
0.0%

Basic Materials

IDGT

-

BUG

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDGT

-

BUG
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

IDGT

-

BUG
0.0%

Energy

IDGT

-

BUG

-

Financial Services

IDGT

-

BUG

-

Healthcare

IDGT

-

BUG
0.0%

Industrials

IDGT

-

BUG

-

Utilities

IDGT

-

BUG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF

Global X Cybersecurity ETF

Often compared with IDGT:
IDGT vs. DTCRIDGT vs. GRIDIDGT vs. TRFKIDGT vs. VPNIDGT vs. EFRAIDGT vs. VOOIDGT vs. CLOU
Often compared with BUG:
BUG vs. CIBRBUG vs. HACKBUG vs. IHAKBUG vs. WCBRBUG vs. BUGG.LBUG vs. IGVBUG vs. WCLD

Return for Risk

IDGT vs. BUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
BUG
BUG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDGT vs. BUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IDGTBUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.53
-0.21

+2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.22
-0.08

+3.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.99

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.00

-0.17

+6.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.17

-0.35

+17.52

IDGT vs. BUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the BUG Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDGT and BUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDGT vs. BUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than BUG's maximum drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and BUG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IDGTBUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.95%

-41.66%

-36.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-37.69%

+28.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

-37.69%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

-41.66%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.71%

-11.75%

+5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-14.38%

-5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

18.53%

-15.38%

Volatility

IDGT vs. BUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) is 9.03%, while Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a volatility of 13.95%. This indicates that IDGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IDGTBUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

13.95%

-4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.61%

26.20%

-8.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.41%

31.21%

-9.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

28.55%

-5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.32%

29.30%

-5.98%

IDGT vs. BUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDGT has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than BUG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDGT vs. BUG - Dividend Comparison

IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than BUG's 0.03% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity ETF		0.03%0.04%0.09%0.10%1.56%0.66%0.46%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF		0.74%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

IDGT and BUG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUG has higher volatility (13.95%) compared to IDGT (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDGT dropped -77.95% vs BUG's -41.66%.

On 5-year performance, IDGT leads with 11.98% vs 3.60% for BUG. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.

IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for IDGT and 0.50% for BUG.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDGT and BUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer