PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICSH vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICSH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICSH achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ICSH has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.76%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


ICSH

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.79%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
2.76%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICSH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
1.45%4.96%5.52%5.58%0.97%0.16%1.61%3.17%2.25%1.63%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ICSH and VOO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013

0.07

The correlation between ICSH and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (10 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICSH vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICSH
VOO

Utilities

100.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

ICSH
100.0%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

ICSH

-

VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

ICSH

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ICSH

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

ICSH

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

ICSH

-

VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

ICSH

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

ICSH

-

VOO
8.5%

Industrials

ICSH

-

VOO
8.3%

Real Estate

ICSH

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

ICSH

-

VOO
35.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICSH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICSH
ICSH Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ICSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSH Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICSH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICSHVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+25.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

6.79

1.43

+5.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

44.30

3.16

+41.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

297.17

14.73

+282.44

ICSH vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICSH Sharpe Ratio is 11.22, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICSH and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICSHVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22

2.39

+8.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

7.64

0.83

+6.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.62

0.87

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.93

0.89

+1.05

Drawdowns

ICSH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICSH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSH and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICSHVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-33.99%

+30.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-8.90%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.10%

-18.69%

+18.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.73%

-24.52%

+23.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.94%

-33.99%

+30.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-3.69%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

1.91%

-1.90%

Volatility

ICSH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) is 0.15%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that ICSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICSHVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

2.84%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.30%

8.90%

-8.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39%

11.80%

-11.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.48%

16.81%

-16.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.06%

18.01%

-16.95%

ICSH vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICSH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICSH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ICSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.34%4.55%5.24%4.78%1.66%0.42%1.21%2.61%2.20%1.36%0.88%0.54%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICSH and VOO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to ICSH (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICSH dropped -3.94% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 2.76% for ICSH. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 2.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for ICSH.

ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

ICSH is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while VOO is S&P 500. ICSH tracks ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index (USD), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for ICSH and 0.03% for VOO.

ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.22 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICSH and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer