ICLR vs. SMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).

SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.

Performance

ICLR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ICLR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICLR ICON Public Limited Company	-39.27%	-13.11%	-25.92%	45.72%	-37.28%	58.84%	13.21%	33.29%	15.21%	49.14%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	6.46%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLR achieves a -39.27% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 6.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLR has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 3.91%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 31.28% annualized return.

ICLR

• 1D: 5.29%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: -39.27%
• 6M: -36.77%
• 1Y: -36.76%
• 3Y*: -19.68%
• 5Y*: -11.37%
• 10Y*: 3.91%

SMH

• 1D: 5.76%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 6M: 17.84%
• 1Y: 81.87%
• 3Y*: 43.47%
• 5Y*: 25.59%
• 10Y*: 31.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ICLR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLR

ICLR Risk / Return Rank: 17
ICLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ICLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ICLR Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ICLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ICLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICLR	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	2.23	-2.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	2.85	-3.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.40	-0.47
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	5.10	-5.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.68	18.29	-19.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICLR vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLR Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLR and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICLR	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	2.23	-2.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.26	0.74	-1.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	0.97	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.28	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between ICLR and SMH is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ICLR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

ICLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICLR ICON Public Limited Company	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.29%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Drawdowns

ICLR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLR drawdown since its inception was -76.87%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLR and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICLR	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.87%	-84.96%	+8.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.54%	-15.95%	-44.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.87%	-45.30%	-31.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.87%	-45.30%	-31.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.04%	-10.03%	-58.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.24%	-41.36%	+18.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.68%	4.44%	+18.24%

Volatility

ICLR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 12.11%. This indicates that ICLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICLR	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.13%	12.11%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.11%	23.95%	+40.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.65%	36.84%	+30.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.48%	34.71%	+8.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.98%	32.28%	+4.70%