ICLO vs. USFR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ICLO (Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Invesco, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. ICLO is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ICLO returned 6.73%/yr vs 4.76%/yr for USFR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLO charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.

Performance

ICLO vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLO achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.60% return.

ICLO

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: 6.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USFR

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 1.98%
• 1Y: 4.03%
• 3Y*: 4.76%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICLO vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ICLO Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF	2.07%	5.27%	7.05%	8.90%	0.38%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	1.60%	4.23%	5.47%	5.18%	0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ICLO and USFR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022	0.07

Return for Risk

ICLO vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLO

ICLO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ICLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ICLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ICLO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ICLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ICLO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

USFR

USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLO vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICLO	USFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.10	15.11	-11.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.95	50.64	-43.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.98	13.43	-11.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	16.01	203.42	-187.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	69.05	787.84	-718.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICLO vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLO Sharpe Ratio is 4.10, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 15.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLO and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICLO	USFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.10	15.11	-11.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	9.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	3.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.83	1.60	+1.23

Drawdowns

ICLO vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLO drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLO and USFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICLO	USFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-1.36%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.35%	-0.02%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.47%	-0.06%	-3.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	0.00%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-0.16%	+0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	0.01%	+0.07%

Volatility

ICLO vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) has a higher volatility of 0.32% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that ICLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICLO	USFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.32%	0.06%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.78%	0.18%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37%	0.27%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.43%	0.40%	+2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.43%	0.81%	+1.62%

ICLO vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICLO has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ICLO vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

ICLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than USFR's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ICLO Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF	5.12%	5.49%	6.51%	7.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	3.91%	4.15%	5.17%	5.12%	1.78%	0.01%	0.40%	2.08%	1.67%	1.03%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICLO and USFR in my portfolio?

ICLO and USFR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICLO or USFR?

ICLO has higher volatility (0.32%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLO dropped -3.47% vs USFR's -1.36%.

Which ETF is better, ICLO or USFR?

On 3-year performance, ICLO leads with 6.73% vs 4.76% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICLO or USFR?

Over the 3-year period, ICLO has performed better with a 6.73% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICLO or USFR?

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for ICLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICLO or USFR?

ICLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 3.91% for USFR.

What is the main difference between ICLO and USFR?

ICLO is categorized as CLO, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for ICLO and 0.15% for USFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.11 vs 4.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.