ICLO vs. QQQ
ICLO (Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Invesco, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. ICLO is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ICLO returned 6.73%/yr vs 28.78%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLO charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
ICLO vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLO achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
ICLO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
ICLO vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLO Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF | 2.07% | 5.27% | 7.05% | 8.90% | 0.38% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -5.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLO and QQQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022 | 0.13 |
The correlation between ICLO and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ICLO vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICLO
QQQ
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ICLO
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
ICLO
QQQ
Basic Materials
ICLO
QQQ
Communication Services
ICLO
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
ICLO
-
QQQ
Energy
ICLO
-
QQQ
Healthcare
ICLO
-
QQQ
Industrials
ICLO
-
QQQ
Real Estate
ICLO
-
QQQ
Technology
ICLO
-
QQQ
Utilities
ICLO
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLO vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
ICLO
QQQ
ICLO vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICLO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.10 | 2.64 | +1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.95 | 3.45 | +3.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.98 | 1.45 | +0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.01 | 3.51 | +12.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 69.05 | 13.49 | +55.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICLO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.10 | 2.64 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.83 | 0.41 | +2.42 |
Drawdowns
ICLO vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLO drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLO and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -82.97% | +79.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.35% | -11.96% | +11.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.47% | -22.77% | +19.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.26% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -32.79% | +32.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 3.11% | -3.03% |
Volatility
ICLO vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) is 0.32%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that ICLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.32% | 4.49% | -4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.78% | 12.10% | -11.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37% | 15.94% | -14.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.43% | 22.38% | -19.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.43% | 22.29% | -19.86% |
ICLO vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLO has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICLO vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
ICLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLO Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF | 5.12% | 5.49% | 6.51% | 7.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLO and QQQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to ICLO (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLO dropped -3.47% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.78% vs 6.73% for ICLO. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ICLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.78% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for ICLO.
ICLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
ICLO is categorized as CLO, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for ICLO and 0.18% for QQQ.
ICLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.10 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICLO and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer