ICLN vs. FAN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN).
ICLN and FAN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. FAN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2008. Both ICLN and FAN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICLN or FAN.
Performance
ICLN vs. FAN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a -21.88% return, which is significantly lower than FAN's -3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed FAN with an annualized return of 3.67%, while FAN has yielded a comparatively higher 6.12% annualized return.
ICLN
-21.88%
-10.08%
-14.10%
-12.36%
3.61%
3.67%
FAN
-3.89%
-9.75%
-7.31%
6.34%
4.26%
6.12%
Key characteristics
| ICLN | FAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.47 | 0.38 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.53 | 0.64 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.94 | 1.08 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.17 | 0.18 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.06 | 1.25 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.11% | 5.71% |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.92% | 18.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.16% | -81.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -68.03% | -36.03% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICLN vs. FAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FAN's 0.62% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and FAN is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICLN vs. FAN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICLN vs. FAN - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than FAN's 1.52% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.81% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% | 2.83% | 2.11% |
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.50% | 1.80% | 0.83% | 2.42% | 2.68% | 2.59% | 6.04% | 2.36% | 2.61% | 0.71% |
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. FAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.16%, which is greater than FAN's maximum drawdown of -81.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and FAN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICLN vs. FAN - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) at 7.71%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.