PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICL vs. CF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ICL vs. CF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICL Group Ltd (ICL) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICL achieves a -10.94% return, which is significantly lower than CF's 33.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ICL has underperformed CF with an annualized return of 7.56%, while CF has yielded a comparatively higher 18.11% annualized return.


ICL

1D
-1.38%
1M
-21.96%
YTD
-10.94%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
-24.12%
3Y*
-1.16%
5Y*
-1.23%
10Y*
7.56%

CF

1D
-1.38%
1M
-16.05%
YTD
33.35%
6M
31.99%
1Y
8.11%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
17.45%
10Y*
18.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICL vs. CF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICL
ICL Group Ltd
-10.94%18.12%2.81%-27.23%-14.74%97.88%7.98%-11.61%52.00%5.43%
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
33.35%-7.17%10.08%-4.75%22.29%87.18%-15.76%12.73%5.13%40.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ICL and CF is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2014

0.38

The correlation between ICL and CF shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ICL:

$6.45B

CF:

$15.79B

EPS

ICL:

$0.20

CF:

$11.08

PE Ratio

ICL:

24.74

CF:

9.22

PEG Ratio

ICL:

18.10

CF:

0.15

PS Ratio

ICL:

0.87

CF:

2.19

PB Ratio

ICL:

1.07

CF:

1.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

ICL:

$7.41B

CF:

$7.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ICL:

$2.25B

CF:

$2.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

ICL:

$1.35B

CF:

$2.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICL vs. CF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICL
ICL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ICL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ICL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

CF
CF Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CF Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICL vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICL Group Ltd (ICL) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICLCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.07

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

0.32

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

0.64

-1.80

ICL vs. CF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICL Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the CF Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICL and CF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICL vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICL drawdown since its inception was -63.87%, smaller than the maximum CF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICL and CF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICLCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.87%

-76.73%

+12.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.77%

-25.45%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.93%

-29.16%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.87%

-48.36%

-15.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.87%

-60.74%

-3.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.48%

-25.45%

-24.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.41%

-24.92%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.90%

12.72%

+8.18%

Volatility

ICL vs. CF - Volatility Comparison

ICL Group Ltd (ICL) has a higher volatility of 10.65% compared to CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) at 8.87%. This indicates that ICL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICLCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.65%

8.87%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.67%

35.55%

-7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.81%

41.80%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.36%

38.13%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.70%

40.23%

-5.53%

Dividends

ICL vs. CF - Dividend Comparison

ICL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than CF's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.96%2.59%2.34%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%
ICL
ICL Group Ltd
2.95%2.29%3.96%7.34%16.15%2.58%1.82%4.45%6.65%7.23%4.23%6.73%

Financials

ICL vs. CF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ICL Group Ltd and CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.02B
1.99B
(ICL) Total Revenue
(CF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ICL vs. CF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ICL Group Ltd and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
30.9%
37.6%
Portfolio components
ICL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ICL Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 626.00M and revenue of 2.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.9%.

CF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.

ICL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ICL Group Ltd reported an operating income of 234.00M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

CF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

ICL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ICL Group Ltd reported a net income of 126.00M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

CF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 615.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ICL and CF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICL has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to CF (8.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICL dropped -63.87% vs CF's -76.73%.

CF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICL and CF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer