ICHN.AS vs. EWL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL).
ICHN.AS and EWL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICHN.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2019. EWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Switzerland Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both ICHN.AS and EWL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICHN.AS or EWL.
Key characteristics
| ICHN.AS | EWL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.11% | 0.62% |
| 1Y Return | 13.43% | 9.79% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.59% | -0.28% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -2.06% | 6.26% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.98 | 1.46 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.12 | 1.17 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.25 | 0.96 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.57 | 4.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.67% | 3.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.46% | 12.71% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.67% | -51.62% |
| Current Drawdown | -46.79% | -9.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICHN.AS and EWL is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ICHN.AS vs. EWL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ICHN.AS achieves a 19.11% return, which is significantly higher than EWL's 0.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICHN.AS vs. EWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICHN.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EWL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICHN.AS vs. EWL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICHN.AS vs. EWL - Dividend Comparison
ICHN.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHN.AS iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.73% | 1.45% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 2.58% | 2.49% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
ICHN.AS vs. EWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICHN.AS drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than EWL's maximum drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHN.AS and EWL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICHN.AS vs. EWL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) at 4.00%. This indicates that ICHN.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.