ICGA.DE vs. SCHG
ICGA.DE (iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICGA.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICGA.DE returned -4.32%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICGA.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
ICGA.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ICGA.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICGA.DE achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 7.69% return.
ICGA.DE
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- -4.32%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 22.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
ICGA.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | -6.86% | 16.64% | 27.28% | -14.71% | -15.17% | -17.27% | 15.31% | 14.05% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 8.00% | 3.56% | 43.86% | 45.60% | -27.58% | 37.70% | 27.67% | 14.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICGA.DE and SCHG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | 0.27 |
The correlation between ICGA.DE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICGA.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
ICGA.DE
SCHG
ICGA.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICGA.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.42 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 4.12 | -3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICGA.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 1.41 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.76 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.91 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
ICGA.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.95%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICGA.DE and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICGA.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.95% | -31.88% | -24.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -15.64% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | -28.18% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.32% | -30.34% | -18.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.56% | -1.46% | -31.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.80% | -5.23% | -23.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | 5.40% | +2.68% |
Volatility
ICGA.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.18%. This indicates that ICGA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICGA.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 3.18% | +4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 11.13% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 15.84% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.66% | 21.97% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 21.86% | +5.11% |
ICGA.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICGA.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICGA.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ICGA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICGA.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ICGA.DE.
ICGA.DE is categorized as China Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. ICGA.DE tracks MSCI China, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ICGA.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for ICGA.DE and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer