PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICF vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 5.54%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


ICF

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
12.19%
6M
11.56%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
5.54%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
12.19%1.85%5.30%10.36%-26.12%44.17%-5.43%25.48%-2.55%4.90%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ICF and SCHD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.59

The correlation between ICF and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICF
SCHD

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

19.2%

Energy

-

16.2%

Financial Services

-

9.3%

Healthcare

-

18.8%

Industrials

-

7.5%

Technology

-

16.4%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Real Estate

ICF
100.0%
SCHD

-

Basic Materials

ICF

-

SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

ICF

-

SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ICF

-

SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

ICF

-

SCHD
19.2%

Energy

ICF

-

SCHD
16.2%

Financial Services

ICF

-

SCHD
9.3%

Healthcare

ICF

-

SCHD
18.8%

Industrials

ICF

-

SCHD
7.5%

Technology

ICF

-

SCHD
16.4%

Utilities

ICF

-

SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICF
ICF Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ICF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICF Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ICF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICF Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICFSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.45

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

5.91

-4.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

14.53

-10.61

ICF vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICF and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICFSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.49

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.58

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.77

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.86

-0.55

Drawdowns

ICF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICFSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-33.37%

-43.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-4.61%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-16.13%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-16.85%

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-33.37%

-6.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-1.40%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-3.32%

-10.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

1.88%

+1.00%

Volatility

ICF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that ICF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICFSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

2.66%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

7.66%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

10.96%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

14.38%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

16.72%

+3.86%

ICF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
2.48%2.88%2.66%2.76%2.64%1.82%2.38%2.55%3.20%3.10%4.21%3.30%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICF has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 5.54% for ICF. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.48% for ICF.

ICF is categorized as REIT, while SCHD is Dividend. ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICF and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer