PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICF vs. O
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICF vs. O - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Realty Income Corporation (O). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICF having a 15.53% return and O slightly lower at 15.17%. Over the past 10 years, ICF has outperformed O with an annualized return of 5.11%, while O has yielded a comparatively lower 4.13% annualized return.


ICF

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.34%
6M
12.79%
YTD
15.53%
1Y
15.37%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
5.11%

O

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.24%
6M
7.65%
YTD
15.17%
1Y
17.83%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
4.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICF vs. O - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
15.53%1.85%5.30%10.36%-26.12%44.17%-5.43%25.48%-2.55%4.90%
O
Realty Income Corporation
15.17%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ICF and O is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2001

0.77

The correlation between ICF and O has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICF vs. O — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICF
ICF Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ICF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICF Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ICF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICF vs. O - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Realty Income Corporation (O). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICFODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.61

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

3.67

+1.68

ICF vs. O - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICF Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the O Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICF and O, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICF vs. O - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than O's maximum drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and O.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-48.45%

-28.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-11.10%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-26.49%

+9.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-34.48%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-48.28%

+8.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-4.72%

+3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.12%

-9.20%

-4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

4.86%

-1.99%

Volatility

ICF vs. O - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 4.88%, while Realty Income Corporation (O) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than O based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

5.92%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

12.55%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

16.67%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

18.98%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

25.65%

-5.03%

Dividends

ICF vs. O - Dividend Comparison

ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than O's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
2.43%2.88%2.66%2.76%2.64%1.82%2.38%2.55%3.20%3.10%4.21%3.30%
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.12%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICF and O have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

O has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to ICF (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs O's -48.45%.

O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICF and O

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer