PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICAP vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ICAP vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ICAP vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ICAP
InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF
-2.78%15.77%14.83%8.82%-10.10%0.57%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
0.70%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%-0.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICAP achieves a -2.78% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 0.70% return.


ICAP

1D
2.73%
1M
-5.34%
YTD
-2.78%
6M
0.55%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
10Y*

RYLD

1D
2.12%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
0.70%
6M
5.49%
1Y
11.70%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICAP vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICAP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ICAP vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICAP
ICAP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ICAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICAP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ICAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICAP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICAP vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICAPRYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.72

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.13

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.92

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.57

4.48

+0.09

ICAP vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICAP Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICAP and RYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICAPRYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.72

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.26

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between ICAP and RYLD is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ICAP vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

ICAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%, less than RYLD's 12.14% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ICAP
InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF
9.95%8.89%8.30%8.65%8.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
12.14%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%

Drawdowns

ICAP vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICAP drawdown since its inception was -24.20%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAP and RYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ICAPRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.20%

-41.53%

+17.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-12.33%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-4.31%

-3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-9.04%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.53%

+0.99%

Volatility

ICAP vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ICAPRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

5.25%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

9.08%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.06%

16.39%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

14.20%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

17.38%

+0.95%