ICAP vs. RYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ICAP (InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICAP is a fund fund actively managed by InfraCap, while RYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. ICAP is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ICAP returned 17.83%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for RYLD. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICAP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

ICAP vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICAP achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 9.51% return.

ICAP

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 6.68%
• 6M: 6.18%
• 1Y: 21.86%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RYLD

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 9.51%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 20.74%
• 3Y*: 8.72%
• 5Y*: 2.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICAP vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ICAP InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF	6.68%	15.77%	14.83%	8.82%	-10.10%	1.08%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	9.51%	5.65%	10.13%	0.27%	-13.03%	0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ICAP and RYLD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2021	0.70

The correlation between ICAP and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICAP vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ICAP	RYLD
Financial Services	20.7%	15.5%
Technology	16.3%	19.0%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	8.0%
Energy	9.3%	5.4%
Utilities	8.7%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	2.3%
Real Estate	7.2%	5.9%
Industrials	5.9%	18.0%
Basic Materials	3.6%	4.7%
Healthcare	3.5%	16.3%
Communication Services	3.1%	2.4%

Return for Risk

ICAP vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICAP

ICAP Risk / Return Rank: 48
ICAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ICAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ICAP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ICAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ICAP Martin Ratio Rank: 49

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 68
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICAP vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICAP	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.96	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.76	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.41	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	3.31	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.81	13.37	-5.55

ICAP vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICAP and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICAP vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICAP drawdown since its inception was -24.20%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAP and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICAP	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.20%	-41.53%	+17.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-6.29%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.31%	-19.05%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-0.50%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.74%	-8.78%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	1.55%	+1.25%

Volatility

ICAP vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.00%. This indicates that ICAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICAP	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.05%	2.00%	+3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.47%	7.80%	+2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.51%	10.66%	+2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.17%	14.05%	+4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	17.15%	+1.02%

ICAP vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICAP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICAP vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

ICAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.58%, less than RYLD's 11.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ICAP InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF	9.58%	8.89%	8.30%	8.65%	8.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.73%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICAP and RYLD in my portfolio?

ICAP and RYLD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICAP or RYLD?

ICAP has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to RYLD (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICAP dropped -24.20% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, ICAP or RYLD?

On 3-year performance, ICAP leads with 17.83% vs 8.72% for RYLD. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICAP or RYLD?

Over the 3-year period, ICAP has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICAP or RYLD?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ICAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICAP or RYLD?

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 9.58% for ICAP.

What is the main difference between ICAP and RYLD?

They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ICAP and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.