IBTL.L vs. VFEG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L).
IBTL.L and VFEG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Jan 20, 2015. VFEG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. Both IBTL.L and VFEG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTL.L or VFEG.L.
Key characteristics
| IBTL.L | VFEG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.69% | 12.76% |
| 1Y Return | 0.14% | 14.91% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -13.37% | 0.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -7.87% | 4.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.05 | 1.13 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.03 | 1.70 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.00 | 1.21 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.01 | 0.76 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.10 | 5.87 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.00% | 2.49% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.66% | 12.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.49% | -25.35% |
| Current Drawdown | -49.30% | -4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTL.L and VFEG.L is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
IBTL.L vs. VFEG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBTL.L achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than VFEG.L's 12.76% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTL.L vs. VFEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTL.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VFEG.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTL.L vs. VFEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTL.L vs. VFEG.L - Dividend Comparison
IBTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, while VFEG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTL.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.34% | 3.82% | 2.95% | 1.73% | 1.86% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.66% | 2.42% | 2.07% |
VFEG.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IBTL.L vs. VFEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTL.L drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than VFEG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTL.L and VFEG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTL.L vs. VFEG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) is 4.84%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that IBTL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.