IBTG vs. SCHR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR).
IBTG and SCHR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. SCHR is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury (3-10 Y). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both IBTG and SCHR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTG or SCHR.
Key characteristics
| IBTG | SCHR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.17% | 2.74% |
| 1Y Return | 5.06% | 6.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.41% | -0.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.51 | 1.48 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.05 | 2.24 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.55 | 5.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.45% | 1.46% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.25% | 5.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.63% | -14.87% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.81% | -4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTG and SCHR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IBTG vs. SCHR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBTG achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly higher than SCHR's 2.74% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTG vs. SCHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTG vs. SCHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTG vs. SCHR - Dividend Comparison
IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than SCHR's 5.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 4.02% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.65% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 5.60% | 4.19% | 3.00% | 1.34% | 2.44% | 3.32% | 4.02% | 2.88% | 2.55% | 2.62% | 1.92% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
IBTG vs. SCHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, smaller than the maximum SCHR drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and SCHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTG vs. SCHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) is 0.27%, while Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that IBTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.