PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBN vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBN vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBN vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBN
ICICI Bank Limited
-13.09%0.57%26.32%9.80%11.27%33.57%-1.52%47.01%6.25%44.03%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
-10.37%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBN achieves a -13.09% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's -10.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IBN having a 15.60% annualized return and VUG not far ahead at 16.03%.


IBN

1D
2.78%
1M
-15.11%
YTD
-13.09%
6M
-14.32%
1Y
-17.20%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
10.56%
10Y*
15.60%

VUG

1D
4.00%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-10.37%
6M
-8.73%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBN vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBN
IBN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBN Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBN Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBN vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBNVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.83

0.81

-1.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.10

1.31

-2.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.18

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

1.11

-1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.76

3.96

-5.72

IBN vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBN Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBN and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBNVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

0.81

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.52

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.75

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.57

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between IBN and VUG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IBN vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

IBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than VUG's 0.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBN
ICICI Bank Limited
0.96%0.84%0.80%0.81%0.57%0.27%0.00%0.19%0.43%0.79%1.98%4.01%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.46%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Drawdowns

IBN vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBN drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBN and VUG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBNVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.09%

-50.68%

-35.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-16.53%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

-35.61%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.05%

-35.61%

-19.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.15%

-13.20%

-10.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.05%

-7.13%

-20.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.57%

4.66%

+4.91%

Volatility

IBN vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 7.00%. This indicates that IBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBNVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

7.00%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.15%

12.65%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.76%

22.68%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.07%

22.23%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.97%

21.38%

+10.59%