PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios

IBM vs. ABBV

Last updated Sep 30, 2023

Compare and contrast key facts about International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBM or ABBV.

Key characteristics


IBMABBV
YTD Return3.35%-4.99%
1Y Return21.15%8.68%
5Y Return (Ann)4.41%14.80%
10Y Return (Ann)1.76%17.25%
Sharpe Ratio1.070.34
Daily Std Dev18.80%21.51%
Max Drawdown-69.40%-45.09%

Fundamentals


IBMABBV
Market Cap$127.81B$263.10B
EPS$2.34$4.86
PE Ratio59.9630.67
PEG Ratio1.281.28
Revenue (TTM)$60.52B$56.02B
Gross Profit (TTM)$32.69B$41.53B
EBITDA (TTM)$12.98B$29.20B

Correlation

0.35
-1.001.00

The correlation between IBM and ABBV is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

IBM vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's -4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, IBM has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 1.76%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 17.25% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
8.92%
-5.19%
IBM
ABBV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs


International Business Machines Corporation

AbbVie Inc.

IBM vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than ABBV's 3.92% yield.


TTM20222021202020192018201720162015201420132012
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
4.72%4.85%5.16%5.91%5.77%6.89%5.07%4.53%5.16%3.89%2.96%2.64%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.92%3.59%4.11%4.94%5.72%4.87%3.44%4.90%4.77%3.66%4.52%0.00%

IBM vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioUlcer Index
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
1.07
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
0.34

IBM vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBM Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of IBM and ABBV.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.07
0.34
IBM
ABBV

IBM vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBM drawdown for the period was -17.61%, roughly equal to the maximum ABBV drawdown of -20.66%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for IBM and ABBV


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-6.36%
-9.76%
IBM
ABBV

IBM vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is 4.63%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that IBM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.63%
4.89%
IBM
ABBV