PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IBLC vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IBLC and NVDA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

IBLC vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
4.75%
451.96%
IBLC
NVDA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IBLC:

-0.03

NVDA:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

IBLC:

0.45

NVDA:

0.79

Omega Ratio

IBLC:

1.05

NVDA:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

IBLC:

-0.04

NVDA:

0.44

Martin Ratio

IBLC:

-0.08

NVDA:

1.20

Ulcer Index

IBLC:

23.03%

NVDA:

13.39%

Daily Std Dev

IBLC:

66.09%

NVDA:

60.76%

Max Drawdown

IBLC:

-62.54%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

IBLC:

-47.67%

NVDA:

-32.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBLC achieves a -30.63% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's -24.42% return.


IBLC

YTD

-30.63%

1M

-13.50%

6M

-28.72%

1Y

-5.73%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

NVDA

YTD

-24.42%

1M

-14.38%

6M

-26.44%

1Y

33.22%

5Y*

70.28%

10Y*

69.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBLC vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBLC is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBLC is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBLC is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBLC is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBLC is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBLC is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IBLC vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IBLC, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
IBLC: -0.03
NVDA: 0.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for IBLC, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
IBLC: 0.45
NVDA: 0.79
The chart of Omega ratio for IBLC, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
IBLC: 1.05
NVDA: 1.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for IBLC, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
IBLC: -0.04
NVDA: 0.44
The chart of Martin ratio for IBLC, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
IBLC: -0.08
NVDA: 1.20

The current IBLC Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBLC and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.03
0.27
IBLC
NVDA

Dividends

IBLC vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than NVDA's 0.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
2.30%1.60%1.79%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.03%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

IBLC vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-47.67%
-32.08%
IBLC
NVDA

Volatility

IBLC vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) have volatilities of 24.10% and 24.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
24.10%
24.83%
IBLC
NVDA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab