IBHF vs. SPHY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY).
IBHF and SPHY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBHF is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Nov 10, 2020. SPHY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the ICE BofAML US High Yield Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBHF or SPHY.
Correlation
The correlation between IBHF and SPHY is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
IBHF vs. SPHY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IBHF:
2.19
SPHY:
1.21
IBHF:
2.89
SPHY:
1.61
IBHF:
1.47
SPHY:
1.23
IBHF:
3.15
SPHY:
1.49
IBHF:
24.10
SPHY:
9.06
IBHF:
0.27%
SPHY:
0.61%
IBHF:
2.96%
SPHY:
4.56%
IBHF:
-11.19%
SPHY:
-21.97%
IBHF:
-2.05%
SPHY:
-3.71%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHF achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly higher than SPHY's -1.56% return.
IBHF
-0.41%
-1.99%
0.85%
6.56%
N/A
N/A
SPHY
-1.56%
-3.54%
-1.15%
5.67%
7.50%
4.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBHF vs. SPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHY's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBHF vs. SPHY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IBHF
SPHY
IBHF vs. SPHY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBHF vs. SPHY - Dividend Comparison
IBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, less than SPHY's 7.98% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 7.14% | 7.17% | 7.33% | 6.01% | 4.55% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 7.98% | 7.80% | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.14% | 5.63% | 5.73% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 4.27% | 4.29% | 3.98% |
Drawdowns
IBHF vs. SPHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHF drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum SPHY drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHF and SPHY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBHF vs. SPHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) is 1.65%, while SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) has a volatility of 2.45%. This indicates that IBHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with IBHF or SPHY
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Additions to Wishlist: Monte-Carlo Simulations
Hello Dmitry,
Is it possible to add Monte-Carlo simulations to the list of available tools? Since Portfolioslab doesn't have it, I need to use some other Websites just to run Monte-Carlos of my portfolios. Thank you!
Investing_4Fun
Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?
Hi,
I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.
I would greatly appreciate a clarification.
Thanks
Luca