IBHD vs. LQD
IBHD (iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF) and LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2024 Term High Yield and Income Index, while LQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. Both are passively managed. IBHD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LQD.
Performance
IBHD vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQD
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
IBHD vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBHD iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -0.91% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHD vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank
IBHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQD
IBHD vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHD) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHD | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHD vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHD | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -24.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -4.41% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.99% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility
IBHD vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHD | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.30% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 8.65% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 8.69% | — |
IBHD vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHD vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
IBHD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHD iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, LQD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHD.
LQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.00% for IBHD.
IBHD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while LQD is Corporate Bonds. IBHD tracks Bloomberg 2024 Term High Yield and Income Index, while LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHD and 0.15% for LQD.
Find the right allocation for IBHD and LQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer