PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IBHC vs. BIL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IBHC and BIL is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

Performance

IBHC vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2023 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHC) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
2.29%
IBHC
BIL

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


IBHC

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BIL

YTD

0.58%

1M

0.36%

6M

2.33%

1Y

5.03%

5Y*

2.43%

10Y*

1.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBHC vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


IBHC
iShares iBonds 2023 Term High Yield & Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for IBHC: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%
Expense ratio chart for BIL: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBHC vs. BIL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHC

BIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIL is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IBHC vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2023 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHC) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
The chart of Calmar ratio for IBHC, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.00460.86
IBHC
BIL


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.005.0010.0015.0020.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.00
20.69
IBHC
BIL

Dividends

IBHC vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

IBHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
IBHC
iShares iBonds 2023 Term High Yield & Income ETF
0.00%0.00%4.16%3.02%4.27%5.51%3.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIL
SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
4.93%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%

Drawdowns

IBHC vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison


-0.35%-0.30%-0.25%-0.20%-0.15%-0.10%-0.05%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.32%
0
IBHC
BIL

Volatility

IBHC vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2023 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHC) is 0.00%, while SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) has a volatility of 0.05%. This indicates that IBHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.02%0.04%0.06%0.08%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
0.05%
IBHC
BIL
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab