IBDQ vs. USFR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR).
IBDQ and USFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBDQ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014. Both IBDQ and USFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBDQ or USFR.
Key characteristics
| IBDQ | USFR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.90% | 1.99% |
| 1Y Return | 4.44% | 5.51% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.22% | 3.01% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.68% | 2.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.16 | 15.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.95% | 0.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.19% | -1.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.61% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDQ and USFR is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
IBDQ vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBDQ achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.99% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBDQ vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBDQ vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBDQ vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than USFR's 5.35% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 3.18% | 3.27% | 2.23% | 2.06% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 5.35% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IBDQ vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDQ drawdown since its inception was -15.19%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDQ and USFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBDQ vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) has a higher volatility of 0.35% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that IBDQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.