IBDQ vs. USFR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR).
IBDQ and USFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBDQ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014. Both IBDQ and USFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBDQ vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBDQ vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 0.00% | 4.13% | 5.12% | 5.23% | -5.91% | -1.49% | 8.27% | 13.59% | -2.39% | 6.28% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 0.93% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Returns By Period
IBDQ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBDQ vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IBDQ vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
IBDQ
USFR
IBDQ vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDQ | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 8.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.57 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDQ and USFR is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
IBDQ vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than USFR's 4.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 2.77% | 3.77% | 3.81% | 3.27% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 4.00% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IBDQ vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDQ | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.16% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
IBDQ vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBDQ | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.29% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.41% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.81% | — |