IBCK.DE vs. CNDX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L).
IBCK.DE and CNDX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBCK.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both IBCK.DE and CNDX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBCK.DE or CNDX.L.
Key characteristics
| IBCK.DE | CNDX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 27.25% | 25.03% |
| 1Y Return | 31.04% | 36.49% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.35% | 9.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.62% | 21.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.19 | 2.03 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.53 | 2.75 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.37 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.56 | 2.69 |
| Martin Ratio | 24.92 | 9.45 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.24% | 3.50% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.66% | 16.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.11% | -35.17% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.17% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCK.DE and CNDX.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IBCK.DE vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBCK.DE achieves a 27.25% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's 25.03% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBCK.DE vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCK.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBCK.DE vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBCK.DE vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
IBCK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCK.DE iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
IBCK.DE vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCK.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, smaller than the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCK.DE and CNDX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBCK.DE vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) is 2.86%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that IBCK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.