IAUM vs. BAR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM) and GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR).
IAUM and BAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAUM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Jun 15, 2021. BAR is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. Both IAUM and BAR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IAUM or BAR.
Performance
IAUM vs. BAR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with IAUM at 24.08% and BAR at 24.08%.
IAUM
24.08%
-4.23%
5.93%
29.29%
N/A
N/A
BAR
24.08%
-5.81%
5.99%
29.21%
11.55%
N/A
Key characteristics
| IAUM | BAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.09 | 2.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.80 | 2.80 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.78 | 3.81 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.67 | 12.69 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.42% | 2.41% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.64% | 14.66% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.87% | -21.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.09% | -8.03% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAUM vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between IAUM and BAR is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IAUM vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM) and GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IAUM vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAUM nor BAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IAUM vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, roughly equal to the maximum BAR drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and BAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IAUM vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM) and GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.