PortfoliosLab logo
IAUF vs. GLDM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IAUF and GLDM is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IAUF vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


IAUF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GLDM

YTD

23.10%

1M

0.00%

6M

25.86%

1Y

35.25%

5Y*

13.01%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IAUF vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IAUF vs. GLDM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IAUF is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IAUF is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLDM is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IAUF vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

IAUF vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAUF nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
IAUF
iShares Gold Strategy ETF
100.19%100.19%13.18%0.88%0.00%7.61%10.04%0.77%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IAUF vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

IAUF vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...