PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IAUF vs. GLDM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IAUFGLDM
YTD Return12.06%12.42%
1Y Return15.25%15.90%
3Y Return (Ann)8.48%9.18%
5Y Return (Ann)11.18%12.42%
Sharpe Ratio1.281.35
Daily Std Dev12.10%12.21%
Max Drawdown-23.35%-21.63%
Current Drawdown-3.01%-2.95%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between IAUF and GLDM is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

IAUF vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IAUF having a 12.06% return and GLDM slightly higher at 12.42%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
72.20%
82.68%
IAUF
GLDM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Gold Strategy ETF

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

IAUF vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IAUF
iShares Gold Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for IAUF: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for GLDM: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IAUF vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAUF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IAUF, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IAUF, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.001.95
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IAUF, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market1.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IAUF, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.001.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IAUF, currently valued at 3.36, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.003.36
GLDM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.001.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 3.70, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.003.70

IAUF vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUF Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which roughly equals the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of IAUF and GLDM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.28
1.35
IAUF
GLDM

Dividends

IAUF vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

IAUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.77%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021202020192018
IAUF
iShares Gold Strategy ETF
11.77%13.18%0.88%0.00%7.61%10.04%0.77%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IAUF vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUF drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUF and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-3.01%
-2.95%
IAUF
GLDM

Volatility

IAUF vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) have volatilities of 5.02% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.02%
5.08%
IAUF
GLDM