IAUF vs. FGDL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL).
IAUF and FGDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAUF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Composite Gold Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018. FGDL is a passively managed fund by Franklin that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Jun 30, 2022. Both IAUF and FGDL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IAUF or FGDL.
Correlation
The correlation between IAUF and FGDL is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IAUF vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
IAUF
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FGDL
27.44%
10.58%
21.92%
44.40%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAUF vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IAUF vs. FGDL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IAUF
FGDL
IAUF vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IAUF vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAUF nor FGDL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUF iShares Gold Strategy ETF | 100.19% | 100.19% | 13.18% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 7.61% | 10.04% | 0.77% |
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IAUF vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
IAUF vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF) is 0.00%, while Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that IAUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.