IAU vs. AAAU
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU).
IAU and AAAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on Jan 28, 2005. AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018. Both IAU and AAAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IAU or AAAU.
Correlation
The correlation between IAU and AAAU is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IAU vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IAU:
2.80
AAAU:
2.82
IAU:
3.70
AAAU:
3.74
IAU:
1.48
AAAU:
1.48
IAU:
5.94
AAAU:
5.95
IAU:
15.95
AAAU:
16.04
IAU:
3.03%
AAAU:
3.02%
IAU:
17.28%
AAAU:
17.17%
IAU:
-45.14%
AAAU:
-21.63%
IAU:
-0.03%
AAAU:
-0.01%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IAU having a 30.42% return and AAAU slightly lower at 30.40%.
IAU
30.42%
12.77%
24.63%
46.92%
14.54%
10.91%
AAAU
30.40%
12.77%
24.66%
46.95%
14.66%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAU vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IAU vs. AAAU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IAU
AAAU
IAU vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IAU vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAU nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IAU vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IAU vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) have volatilities of 8.98% and 8.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.