IAG vs. IAUM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM).

IAUM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Jun 15, 2021.

Performance

IAG vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IAG vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation	14.13%	219.57%	103.95%	-1.94%	-17.57%	7.93%
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro	8.63%	64.27%	27.04%	13.12%	-0.49%	3.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than IAUM's 8.63% return.

IAG

• 1D: 7.54%
• 1M: -23.40%
• YTD: 14.13%
• 6M: 45.55%
• 1Y: 201.12%
• 3Y*: 90.79%
• 5Y*: 43.07%
• 10Y*: 23.61%

IAUM

• 1D: 3.78%
• 1M: -11.00%
• YTD: 8.63%
• 6M: 21.30%
• 1Y: 49.82%
• 3Y*: 33.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IAG vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAG

IAG Risk / Return Rank: 95
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

IAUM

IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 88
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAG vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IAG	IAUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.23	1.82	+1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.26	+0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.33	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.76	2.72	+3.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.44	10.05	+7.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IAG vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAG Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG and IAUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IAG	IAUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.23	1.82	+1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	1.29	-1.17

Correlation

The correlation between IAG and IAUM is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IAG vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAG nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IAG vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and IAUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAG	IAUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.55%	-20.87%	-74.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.60%	-19.15%	-15.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.40%	-13.18%	-10.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.44%	-4.98%	-51.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.42%	5.18%	+6.24%

Volatility

IAG vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a higher volatility of 20.42% compared to iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) at 10.97%. This indicates that IAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IAG	IAUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.42%	10.97%	+9.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.69%	23.96%	+24.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.70%	27.51%	+35.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.89%	17.78%	+42.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.14%	17.78%	+41.36%