PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IAG vs. IAUM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IAG and IAUM is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

IAG vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
36.76%
12.62%
IAG
IAUM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IAG:

2.14

IAUM:

2.31

Sortino Ratio

IAG:

2.82

IAUM:

3.00

Omega Ratio

IAG:

1.35

IAUM:

1.40

Calmar Ratio

IAG:

1.41

IAUM:

4.27

Martin Ratio

IAG:

12.65

IAUM:

11.58

Ulcer Index

IAG:

9.95%

IAUM:

2.98%

Daily Std Dev

IAG:

58.82%

IAUM:

14.95%

Max Drawdown

IAG:

-95.55%

IAUM:

-20.87%

Current Drawdown

IAG:

-74.54%

IAUM:

-3.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly higher than IAUM's 2.98% return.


IAG

YTD

8.14%

1M

9.63%

6M

39.15%

1Y

140.52%

5Y*

13.17%

10Y*

5.80%

IAUM

YTD

2.98%

1M

4.05%

6M

12.57%

1Y

33.09%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IAG vs. IAUM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IAG is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IAG is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IAG is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IAG is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IAG is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IAG is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IAUM is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IAUM is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IAUM is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IAUM is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IAUM is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IAUM is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IAG vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IAG, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.142.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for IAG, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.823.00
The chart of Omega ratio for IAG, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.351.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for IAG, currently valued at 3.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.314.27
The chart of Martin ratio for IAG, currently valued at 12.65, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0012.6511.58
IAG
IAUM

The current IAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG and IAUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.14
2.31
IAG
IAUM

Dividends

IAG vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAG nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IAG vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and IAUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.27%
-3.09%
IAG
IAUM

Volatility

IAG vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a higher volatility of 12.72% compared to iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM) at 3.66%. This indicates that IAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.72%
3.66%
IAG
IAUM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab