IAG vs. CDC
Compare and contrast key facts about IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC).
CDC is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014.
Performance
IAG vs. CDC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IAG vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | 14.13% | 219.57% | 103.95% | -1.94% | -17.57% | -14.71% | -1.61% | 1.36% | -36.88% | 51.43% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 9.03% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -4.99% | -7.86% | 33.05% | 12.88% | 19.64% | -5.97% | 15.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than CDC's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IAG has outperformed CDC with an annualized return of 23.61%, while CDC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.
IAG
- 1D
- 7.54%
- 1M
- -23.40%
- YTD
- 14.13%
- 6M
- 45.55%
- 1Y
- 201.12%
- 3Y*
- 90.79%
- 5Y*
- 43.07%
- 10Y*
- 23.61%
CDC
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAG vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank
IAG
CDC
IAG vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAG | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.23 | 0.93 | +2.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.12 | 1.33 | +1.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.19 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.76 | 1.23 | +4.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.44 | 4.90 | +12.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAG | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23 | 0.93 | +2.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.50 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.76 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.74 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between IAG and CDC is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IAG vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison
IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.19% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
Drawdowns
IAG vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and CDC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAG | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.55% | -21.37% | -74.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.60% | -11.27% | -23.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.52% | -21.37% | -53.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.46% | -21.37% | -65.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.40% | -3.07% | -20.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.44% | -5.14% | -51.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.42% | 2.84% | +8.58% |
Volatility
IAG vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison
IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a higher volatility of 20.42% compared to VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) at 2.97%. This indicates that IAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IAG | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.42% | 2.97% | +17.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.69% | 7.03% | +41.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.70% | 13.63% | +49.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.89% | 12.56% | +47.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.14% | 13.22% | +45.92% |