PortfoliosLab logo
IAC vs. PALL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IAC and PALL is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

IAC vs. PALL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
929.15%
98.80%
IAC
PALL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IAC:

-0.31

PALL:

-0.26

Sortino Ratio

IAC:

-0.19

PALL:

-0.15

Omega Ratio

IAC:

0.98

PALL:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

IAC:

-0.15

PALL:

-0.11

Martin Ratio

IAC:

-0.67

PALL:

-0.53

Ulcer Index

IAC:

17.82%

PALL:

15.92%

Daily Std Dev

IAC:

38.81%

PALL:

32.70%

Max Drawdown

IAC:

-77.26%

PALL:

-73.63%

Current Drawdown

IAC:

-75.26%

PALL:

-70.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAC achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than PALL's 2.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IAC has outperformed PALL with an annualized return of 10.99%, while PALL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.33% annualized return.


IAC

YTD

0.45%

1M

-11.51%

6M

-15.28%

1Y

-9.91%

5Y*

-2.32%

10Y*

10.99%

PALL

YTD

2.75%

1M

-3.30%

6M

-21.30%

1Y

-4.95%

5Y*

-14.89%

10Y*

1.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IAC vs. PALL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IAC is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IAC is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IAC is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IAC is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IAC is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IAC is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PALL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PALL is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PALL is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PALL is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PALL is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PALL is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PALL is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IAC vs. PALL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for IAC, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
IAC: -0.31
PALL: -0.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for IAC, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
IAC: -0.19
PALL: -0.15
The chart of Omega ratio for IAC, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
IAC: 0.98
PALL: 0.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for IAC, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
IAC: -0.15
PALL: -0.11
The chart of Martin ratio for IAC, currently valued at -0.67, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
IAC: -0.67
PALL: -0.53

The current IAC Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is comparable to the PALL Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAC and PALL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.31
-0.26
IAC
PALL

Dividends

IAC vs. PALL - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAC nor PALL has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IAC
IAC/InterActiveCorp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.26%1.91%
PALL
Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IAC vs. PALL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAC drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, roughly equal to the maximum PALL drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAC and PALL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-75.26%
-70.91%
IAC
PALL

Volatility

IAC vs. PALL - Volatility Comparison

IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC) has a higher volatility of 17.05% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) at 7.95%. This indicates that IAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.05%
7.95%
IAC
PALL