HYTR vs. JNK
HYTR (CP High Yield Trend ETF) and JNK (SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYTR tracks the CP High Yield Trend Index while JNK tracks the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYTR returned 2.06%/yr vs 3.68%/yr for JNK. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYTR charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JNK.
Performance
HYTR vs. JNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYTR achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than JNK's 1.51% return.
HYTR
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- —
JNK
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 7.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 5.01%
HYTR vs. JNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYTR CP High Yield Trend ETF | 0.23% | 5.95% | 7.25% | 8.31% | -11.29% | 2.75% | -0.95% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 1.51% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYTR and JNK is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HYTR and JNK shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYTR vs. JNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYTR
JNK
Energy
Technology
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
HYTR
JNK
Technology
HYTR
JNK
Real Estate
HYTR
JNK
-
Basic Materials
HYTR
-
JNK
-
Communication Services
HYTR
-
JNK
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYTR
-
JNK
-
Consumer Defensive
HYTR
-
JNK
-
Financial Services
HYTR
-
JNK
-
Healthcare
HYTR
-
JNK
-
Industrials
HYTR
-
JNK
-
Utilities
HYTR
-
JNK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYTR vs. JNK — Risk / Return Rank
HYTR
JNK
HYTR vs. JNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYTR | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.90 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 2.89 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.90 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | 12.79 | -5.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYTR | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.90 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.49 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.42 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
HYTR vs. JNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYTR drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum JNK drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTR and JNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYTR | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -38.48% | +25.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.28% | -2.51% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.93% | -5.02% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.25% | -16.67% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.26% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -3.70% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.57% | +0.12% |
Volatility
HYTR vs. JNK - Volatility Comparison
CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) have volatilities of 1.10% and 1.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYTR | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.13% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 2.97% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 3.82% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 7.54% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.86% | 8.31% | -2.45% |
HYTR vs. JNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYTR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than JNK's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYTR vs. JNK - Dividend Comparison
HYTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than JNK's 6.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYTR CP High Yield Trend ETF | 5.71% | 5.78% | 5.55% | 5.43% | 1.24% | 3.70% | 3.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.62% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, HYTR and JNK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JNK has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to HYTR (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTR dropped -13.25% vs JNK's -38.48%.
On 5-year performance, JNK leads with 3.68% vs 2.06% for HYTR. On fees, JNK is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JNK has performed better with a 3.68% return vs 2.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JNK is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HYTR.
JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 5.71% for HYTR.
HYTR tracks CP High Yield Trend Index, while JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HYTR and 0.40% for JNK.
JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYTR and JNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer