HYSA vs. HYGH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HYSA (Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF) and HYGH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYSA returned 6.36% vs 7.78% for HYGH. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYSA charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for HYGH.

Performance

HYSA vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSA achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 2.94% return.

HYSA

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 1.49%
• 1Y: 6.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYGH

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 3.59%
• 1Y: 7.78%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: 6.97%
• 10Y*: 6.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSA vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HYSA Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF	1.26%	8.37%	6.71%	5.98%
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF	2.94%	6.94%	11.22%	3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSA and HYGH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023	0.43

HYSA vs. HYGH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYSA	HYGH
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.4%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	99.6%

Return for Risk

HYSA vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSA

HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 42
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 38
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 49

HYGH

HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 76
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 69
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSA vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYSA	HYGH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.14	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	3.26	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.40	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	4.82	-2.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.16	18.86	-10.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYSA vs. HYGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the HYGH Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSA and HYGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYSA	HYGH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	2.14	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.37	0.56	+0.81

Drawdowns

HYSA vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSA drawdown since its inception was -4.90%, smaller than the maximum HYGH drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSA and HYGH.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYSA	HYGH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-23.88%	+18.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.15%	-1.62%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.13%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.68%	-2.23%	+1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.41%	+0.37%

Volatility

HYSA vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) at 0.61%. This indicates that HYSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYSA	HYGH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	0.61%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.55%	2.84%	+0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.68%	3.65%	+1.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.08%	7.07%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.08%	8.35%	-2.27%

HYSA vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGH's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYSA vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison

HYSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than HYGH's 6.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF	6.62%	6.86%	7.85%	8.95%	6.21%	3.74%	4.06%	4.89%	6.45%	4.79%	4.60%	5.75%
HYSA Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF	6.76%	6.70%	6.99%	2.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYSA and HYGH in my portfolio?

HYSA and HYGH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYSA or HYGH?

HYSA has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to HYGH (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSA dropped -4.90% vs HYGH's -23.88%.

Which ETF is better, HYSA or HYGH?

On 1-year performance, HYGH leads with 7.78% vs 6.36% for HYSA. On fees, HYGH is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, HYGH has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYSA or HYGH?

Over the 1-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 7.78% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYSA or HYGH?

HYGH is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HYSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYSA or HYGH?

HYSA has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 6.62% for HYGH.

What is the main difference between HYSA and HYGH?

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for HYSA and 0.53% for HYGH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.