PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMB vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYMB vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMB achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, HYMB has underperformed HYG with an annualized return of 2.36%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.99% annualized return.


HYMB

1D
0.16%
1M
1.95%
YTD
3.60%
6M
3.52%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
2.36%

HYG

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.53%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
4.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMB vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
3.60%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%9.51%4.91%3.22%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.54%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMB and HYG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2011

0.18

Over the past year, HYMB and HYG have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMB vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMB vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYMBHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.41

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

10.57

-2.08

HYMB vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMB and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYMB vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMBHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-34.25%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.34%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

-4.56%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-15.79%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

-22.03%

-7.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-3.23%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.53%

+0.34%

Volatility

HYMB vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) is 0.85%, while iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that HYMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMBHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

1.13%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

3.11%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

3.88%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.67%

7.54%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.36%

8.27%

+3.09%

HYMB vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYMB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYMB vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than HYG's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.51%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMB and HYG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYG has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to HYMB (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMB dropped -29.57% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 10-year performance, HYG leads with 4.99% vs 2.36% for HYMB. On fees, HYMB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYG has performed better with a 4.99% return vs 2.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYMB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 4.51% for HYMB.

HYMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYMB and 0.49% for HYG.

HYMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMB and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer